I’m on board with the kUSD and ERGx naming system.
Question. Why peg our stablecoin directly to the USD, when a lot of us don’t really have faith in USD.
Would it be better to make a stable version of ERG called kERG?
kERG the stablecoin would be backed by ERGx the Reserve Coin.
Then you could trade the stable kERG into any local stablecoin like kUSD, kEUR, kYEN, USDT, DAI…
An Ergo DEX could make behind the scenes trading pairs through kERG so that any trading pair is possible.
BTC/ETH
BTC ← kERG → ETH
BTC/kUSD
BTC ← kERG → kUSD
kUSD/kYEN
kUSD ← kERG → kYEN
Could this provide more liquidity between even super small cap coins?
Let’s say someone wanted to trade AliceCoin for BTC, and someone else wanted to trade BobCoin for ETH.
If all the trades go through kERG, then it is possible to look at a chart and trade AliceCoin/BobCoin.
Shared liquidity and custom trading pairs could be massive.
kERG could be pegged to either a basket of top 10 Fiats or to the 200 week moving average of ERG itself.
I might be nice to have it pegged to a combination of both, so when ERG gains value the importance of the Fiat value to the peg becomes diminished.
Also, what about time lock delays in moving in and out of kERG. The rate at which you can move in or out can opened or closed slightly to allow more flow in one direction or the other, like a hydraulic dampening system to smooth out the price fluctuations.
If it’s easy for long term holders and believers to move all of their ERG into the ERGx Reserve, then their balance of available kUSD will be growing consistently.
I want my Ergo stablecoin backed by ERG only. Let’s incentivize locking up more ERG into our stablecoin reserves, not ETH or BTC.
Economics and math is above my pay grade.
Sorry for talking so much, I’m just brainstorming.